Thinking aloud about the war in China


Thousands of conspiracy theories around the world are flooding not only social media, but also mainstream media.

We have a problem and it is quite serious because it is a common sense problem that is not as "common" as we generally believe. There are no conspiracy theories that could involve all of the world's political leaders. It & # 39; s as simple as that and that in itself is a political axiom.

However, people challenge the primacy of their own sensory experience by ignoring the obvious and instead believing what they perceive through their fantasies rather than what they see .

Yes, there are conspiracy theories and they pose a real threat to democratic institutions. But these do not involve more than two or three conspirators and some of their relatives, very close associates. When leaders from all over the Western world are actively involved in a health problem that turns into a global crisis, it creates confusion and panic. Then he finds room for manipulation and political gain and awakens Hitler syndrome that most leaders hide deep in their minds. This is not, however, a plot.

Simplicity is beautiful, especially in thought. Simple thinking is philosophy, so let's philosophize

When Donald Trump was elected president in November 2016, he was not a politician. Instead, he was a high-risk businessman who took control of the Republican Party during a hostile takeover and won the election because his opponent was politically corrupt, controversial and only appealed to specific minorities like New York's urban elites, gays. . community and Wall Street.

In the United States, however, Main Street still prevails.

See the USA USA As a company, Trump realized that the main threat to the company he now ran was China and the unbeatable methods the Chinese Communist Party used to, early or later, conquer the world.

As a good businessman, Trump saw the future dimension of the problem and began to approach the problem in two directions: tariff barriers and the repatriation of American industrial factories that had constantly moved to China since the era. Bill Clinton in the 1990s. 1990.

To this end, Trump had to deal with the deep-seated American political and corporate establishment, which China had established as a very profitable enterprise. operating modeand who refused to change the status quo

Trump's political adventures began with actions to contain China and culminated in several attempts to connect Trump to the Kremlin and ended with the establishment of a political trial, with the Democratic Party playing the role of & # 39; "useful idiots" who they presented a pathetic spectacle that had to fail before starting.

Wall Street and the American industrial establishment, which have remained faithful to Lenin's prophecy that "the capitalists will sell us the rope with which we will hang them", celebrated because they think that organized recall procedures have politically defeated Trump and failed. Enough time to implement your containment plan in China.

Then, of course, the Wuhan virus came and everything was turned upside down. The world has been forced to navigate unknown waters with socially broken sails and corrupted engines.

The equation is much more difficult and it is the golden opportunity for Trump to declare war on China.

War, of course, is decided by very few, but it involves many. Waging war is not a conspiracy affair, it is a matter of allies. In this war, it appears that the United States under Trump has two powerful potential allies: Vladimir Putin's Russia and an EU led politically and militarily by Frenchman Emmanuel Macron.

The belligerents are there and ready with an alliance between the United States, Russia and the EU on the one hand, and the Chinese neo-Maoist regime of Xi Jinping, supported by the creation of Wall Street, d & # 39; On the other hand.

In this phase we can only see the tip of the iceberg in the confrontation and we do not know exactly how it will end. For the moment, it seems that an armed conflict is out of the question because all the leaders of any belligerent nations would be destroyed or replaced by others. Needless to say, the kind of destruction and suffering that would happen to all of humanity if a bitter war of this magnitude began.

Therefore, this war is likely to be "cold". In fact, we are already in the midst of a new cold war as combatants, but also as victims at the same time.

China's sole objective at present is the survival of the unstable communist regime which leads one of the harshest dictatorships in modern times. If, for any reason, the communist regime loses power, Xi and his henchmen will be executed after being publicly humiliated. Therefore, isolating China from the international community is in fact the most convenient course of action for Beijing.

Before considering the option of using its nuclear capabilities, the United States-Russia-EU alliance has three weapons of "total destruction":

China's responsibilities for the Wuhan virus and the damage it has caused to the world may well turn into "crimes against humanity" and will likely also involve the World Health Organization. This would imply that a new international court of justice could confiscate all Chinese assets in the world to compensate the victims. Collateral damage to such a movement may be the existence of the United Nations, as well as its affiliated organizations, mostly unnecessary and costly, which will be replaced by a new international body governed exclusively by the American triumvirate. US-Russia-EU in The role of an international arbiter rather than peace for the purpose of an NGO strengthened with limited prerogatives.

When it comes to the environment and the damage to the planet caused by China's carbon footprint, the ground is very fertile for the role of "useful idiot" due to a particular Swedish autistic teenager and great work from public back office professional relations specialists. who encouraged her and the young people of the world to say that they (who?) have destroyed their future. It is obvious that when "they" are appointed, China will be considered the first polluter in the world.

The fact that the contamination is in fact due to western factories deployed in mainland China and which operate according to the rules of the "Wild West" is unimportant because doubts require minimal reflection that "useful idiots" generally do not.

The third weapon of the alliance is that China grossly violates human rights in terms of labor relations and child slave labor. The problem is real and it is another front of the new cold war where another battle can be fought on a global scale with whole armies of volunteer "useful idiots".

The outcome of this cold war between the alliance and the China-Wall Street axis will affect all facets of our lives. The war, which we hope will remain "cold", is in fact two wars in one.

The war will face a democratic alliance against the worst remnants of communism and, in the context of Western society, the old against the new. Concretely, the "new" emerges from bottom-up developments and moves away from the traditional socio-economic order, which already feels precarious and precarious. This second part of the war, if it begins, can end in a bloodbath. This is why, more than ever, we need wise, positive and intelligent leaders to manage global affairs through minimalism and moderation.

It reminds me of Plato Republic and the concept of "Philosophical Kings".

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *